Barbarians vs Civil societies
It is a historical fact: barbarians start as barbarians to win over soft civilised societies, weakened by own civil and high thinking and living habits, and then once pinnacle is reached, they themselves become civil, soft and start high thinking and high living, become ripe for another emerging barbarian groups to attack leveraging the civil behaviour of the opponent to own advantage. The in built tolerance of the civil society itself is used by these forces to survive and destroy the civil society. Perhaps the only exception to that cycle is , may be Afghanistan. After Genghis Khan winning all over, still, the country continued to live in highly volatile manner. Not becoming civil could be the best stable option? Kurukshetra war is a symbol of that need for good people ultimately to pick up the weapons of destruction to establish back civil society. The new barbaric groups amongst Islam , can cause doom to the societies in a similar manner, if they continue to apply their civic laws...