Barbarians vs Civil societies

It is a historical fact: barbarians start as barbarians to win over soft civilised societies, weakened by own civil and high thinking and living habits, and then once pinnacle is reached, they themselves become civil, soft and start high thinking and high living, become ripe for another emerging barbarian groups to attack leveraging the civil behaviour of the opponent to own advantage. The in built tolerance of the civil society itself is used by these forces to survive and destroy the civil society.

Perhaps the only exception to that cycle is , may be Afghanistan. After Genghis Khan winning all over, still, the country continued to live in highly volatile manner. Not becoming civil could be the best stable option?

Kurukshetra war is a symbol of that need for good people ultimately to pick up the weapons of destruction to establish back civil society.

The new barbaric groups amongst Islam , can cause doom to the societies in a similar manner, if they continue to apply their civic laws to deal with them. More than 80% of the world is now living in fear, daily scanning each other for hidden weapons!!

Signs of refusing to do so, are slowly appearing in Europe and Australia.

I was happy Modi did not act like the standard hypocritical politicians, by refusing publicly the gift of skull cap to be worn on stage but insisted on a shawl. The English media went agog shouting at Modi for not showing respect to other religion. But I like his strength of character.

Not being true to own religion and then aping is not the way you respect another religion.

Political correctness will kill the truth.